first world intifada

Bullshit stemming from the mind of a nineteen year old politics student/activist/cynic/wanker

May 1, 2012 at 9:40pm
0 notes

“Hippy” seems to be a derogatory term these days.

And I can’t really work out why. 

I’m generations too long to have been at the height of that culture, but from everything I’ve seen and heard about it, it looks like it was amazing.

Maybe it’s been romanticized, I’m not sure. But it seemed like a time where young people, people full of both inner and outer beauty, seemed to jump up out of nowhere and there was this fantastic energy and appreciation of life that hadn’t been seen before ever, and it was there from and for everyone who got involved. It was a feeling of anything was possible with little judgement and acceptance was a lot more rife.

Reading that back, it all seems a little too good to be true, a little euphoric and a utopia that doesn’t really set it straight. But, the aims were positive and the values that were held by it were great. They looked past the mundane and the unnecessary in life and focused on love, peace. A massive group of people fighting for something good and decent.

Nowadays, people are called ‘hippies’ for being overemotional about things, as if being passionate, always loving and insightful about this one life we have, this one incredible and beautiful life, is a bad thing. “Get a job.” Mmm. Right. Valid point, but once again…why is appreciating life and grabbing it by the horns a bad thing? Why should you get a job that you hate, that helps noone, just because everyone tells you to? Get a job, but by God make it a good one. One that helps others, not spunking it away in Tescos making a till go ‘beep’.

I think the ideals of that movement in the 1970s have also dissolved, seeped away, and it can be seen in so many ways. People don’t ally together over something anymore, and the feeling of being alienated is gone. People just don’t commit to things anymore. My example as such being Kony 2012…how many of us went and did that ‘Cover the Night’ thing? Furthermore - and myself being included in this, I will admit - how many of us questioned it and were critical? We’ve become so different, so much more individualistic and yet at the same time so scared of making a mass change to this life together, that something like what happened then won’t be repeated.

Which is a shame, because it needs to be. I feel sometimes that there needs to be another ‘rise of the hippy’ movement, a kind of brilliant counterculture that embodies values we can all support because they’re so fundamental to everything we are, despite our differences on a more superficial scale. But it probably won’t. We’re all too busy being on Facebook. 

While I rant and rave about the perfection of it all, nothing sums it up better than this quote…

Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era—the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run … but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant… . 
History is hard to know, because of all the hired bullshit, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.

My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights—or very early mornings—when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder’s jacket … booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) … but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that… .

There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda… . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning… .

And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting—on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave… .

So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.

9:14pm
5,605 notes
Reblogged from barackobama

It happens when a father realizes he doesn’t just love his daughter, but also her wife. It happens when a soldier tells his unit that he’s gay, and they tell him they knew it all along and they didn’t care, because he was the toughest guy in the unit. It happens when a video sparks a movement to let every single young person know they’re not alone, and things will get better.

It happens when people look past their ultimately minor differences to see themselves in the hopes and struggles of their fellow human beings. That’s where change is happening.

And that’s not just the story of the gay rights movement. That’s the story of America—the slow, inexorable march towards a more perfect union.

— Obama gets a lot of things wrong. But this, this is what America really needs in a President. Things like this.

(Source: barackobama)

4:12pm
18 notes
Reblogged from azspot
azspot:

Ruben Bolling

azspot:

Ruben Bolling

4:03pm
125 notes
Reblogged from azspot
azspot:

Paul Combs

azspot:

Paul Combs

April 29, 2012 at 1:15pm
0 notes

Every 26 seconds, a woman in South Africa is raped. What the hell is wrong with the world? →

April 28, 2012 at 6:32pm
99 notes
Reblogged from azspot

Insanity: CISPA Just Got Way Worse, And Then Passed On Rushed Vote →

Up until this afternoon, the final vote on CISPA was supposed to be tomorrow. Then, abruptly, it was moved up today—and the House voted in favor of its passage with a vote of 248-168. But that’s not even the worst part.

The vote followed the debate on amendments, several of which were passed. Among them was an absolutely terrible change (pdf and embedded below—scroll to amendment #6) to the definition of what the government can do with shared information, put forth by Rep. Quayle. Astonishingly, it was described as limiting the government’s power, even though it in fact expands it by adding more items to the list of acceptable purposes for which shared information can be used. Even more astonishingly, it passed with a near-unanimous vote. The CISPA that was just approved by the House is much worse than the CISPA being discussed as recently as this morning.

Previously, CISPA allowed the government to use information for “cybersecurity” or “national security” purposes. Those purposes have not been limited or removed. Instead, three more valid uses have been added: investigation and prosecution of cybersecurity crime, protection of individuals, and protection of children. Cybersecurity crime is defined as any crime involving network disruption or hacking, plus any violation of the CFAA.

Basically this means CISPA can no longer be called a cybersecurity bill at all. The government would be able to search information it collects under CISPA for the purposes of investigating American citizens with complete immunity from all privacy protections as long as they can claim someone committed a “cybersecurity crime”. Basically it says the 4th Amendment does not apply online, at all. Moreover, the government could do whatever it wants with the data as long as it can claim that someone was in danger of bodily harm, or that children were somehow threatened—again, notwithstanding absolutely any other law that would normally limit the government’s power.

(Source: azspot)

6:19pm
0 notes

I’m going to try and use this more often and use it for my political interests more often

Having said that, now and then it’s going to divert. Meh.

6:16pm
0 notes

They are fighting the Muslims in Sudan. And Obama has sent troops, United States troops to remove them from the battlefield, which means kill them. … So that’s a new war, a hundred troops to wipe out Christians in Sudan, Uganda.

— Rush Limbaugh on the Obama Administration’s decision to send advisors to tackle Lord’s Resistance Army threats, October 2011.

April 25, 2012 at 10:02am
0 notes

This is one of the most exciting bands I’ve come across in a very long while.

March 30, 2012 at 5:33pm
0 notes

Charles Manson on Jesus